Who gets to decide whether a life is worth preserving or
not? Who gets to decide the fate of a newborn who hasn't yet seen the world?
A newborn who might not be able to appreciate the beauty of
life. A newborn who may forever be dependent on external support. A newborn who
may never be able to fully reach his potential.
Or who may…
Who may actually be a boon to mankind. Who may entertain
millions with his talent. Who may find the cure to cancer. Who may just live a
happy life. Who may survive as a fighter. Who maybe just another person LIVING.
Is it the doctor who
works his best to save him/her from becoming an ‘it’? For a doctor it
might just be an achievement... The 'I
saved him' tag. The 'I gave him a
second life' tag. But, is he going to be a part of his life forever? No.
Is it the parents who
waited patiently to feel the first kick, to hear the first cry and then find
out that the baby is 'defective'?
Afterall, they are the ones who are going to live with the child… or maybe ‘bear’ with the child (harsh but true words).
For some of them, the child maybe a 'burden'-
a drain on their personal resources- time, strength and finances. But for
others the child can be a pure source of joy.
I have seen the way a
mother's face lights up when she sees her baby for the first time.
I have also seen the way her eyes swell up when she hears that her child needs corrective surgery and that her child, being the tiny being he is, may not be able to survive through it.
I have seen the way a surgeon's face lights up when the child survives the grueling surgery and the critical post-surgery days.
But rarely have I seen a doctor getting really emotional about letting the child go. (A defense mechanism that comes with experience, to keep working and carry on with duties.)
I have also seen the way her eyes swell up when she hears that her child needs corrective surgery and that her child, being the tiny being he is, may not be able to survive through it.
I have seen the way a surgeon's face lights up when the child survives the grueling surgery and the critical post-surgery days.
But rarely have I seen a doctor getting really emotional about letting the child go. (A defense mechanism that comes with experience, to keep working and carry on with duties.)
So what happens when a neonate's
fate is to be decided? What should be done when the decision is to be made?
Whose decision is more important- the doctor’s or the parents’?
What should be done when
a neonate goes into cardiac arrest? A doctor can save him with the CPR... But
those crucial minutes of lost oxygen may render him a vegetable for life. An
adult gets the option to sign a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) to be saved from the torture of ‘hanging up there’. But a neonate? Who
gets to decide for them?
What is more important?
Saving a neonate from death or saving a LIFE? Giving the ability to breathe or
giving a life?
The emotional turmoil of a young doctor can rarely be
cleared. These questions don't really have any answers. Experience may just harden up our souls and hearts- make us indifferent to some things.
(Apologies to the Grammar Nazis for the chaotic language.)